Reviews and Ratings for solicitor Elissa Thursfield, Llandudno

Thursday 5 June 2014

Zero Hours Contract Debate


Zero Hours Contracts


The Queen’s speech announced on 4th June that abuses of Zero Hours contracts are to be cracked down on. Although a sweeping generalisation Zero Hours Contracts (ZHCs) are extremely popular with employers and generally disliked by employees.


Although touted as providing flexibility and freedom for employees, the reality is, unless the employee on a ZHC has an element of financial security the arrangement is worrisome and open to abuse. ZHCs are important for employers, they enable them to meet demand and reduce the workforce during times when trade falls quiet without suffering the expense of employees sitting around doing nothing.


Under a ZHC an employer is not under an obligation to give an employee any hours, the hours supplied might vary from week to week, or even day to day. Abuses include cancelling shifts at the last minute; reducing hours to punish an employee and maintaining an employee can only exclusively work for the ZHC provider and no other employer. This final requirement strips away an right an employee may have to find financial security elsewhere during times when hours are scarce.


Reforms have been suggested by a number of pressure groups over the months, some want a complete ban, others want employees to be given the right to ask for minimum hours (which in itself could be open to abuse by employers limiting their liability and selecting the bare minimum).


 The Head of the CIPD public policy Ben Willmott acknowledged tighter legislation is required and that there is bad practice which needs to be address. He gave short notice cancellations as an example and exclusivity clauses.


In a recovering economy the UK workforce needs to show an element of flexibility and employers have to be able to protect their businesses in order to limit the financial damage that slow months can bring. Banning zero hours contracts could do more harm than good, recruitment would be likely to slow and knee jerk reactions in respect of redundancies may become the response of employers.

No comments:

Post a Comment