Reviews and Ratings for solicitor Elissa Thursfield, Llandudno

Tuesday 2 September 2014

Reasonable Adjustments for Carers?



Reasonable Adjustments for Carers?

 

Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence recently provided some useful guidance on the obligation to make reasonable adjustments. The case concerned a carer who worked for the MoD and was based in Germany. Her daughter had Down ’s syndrome and the appropriate education was not available at Ms Hainsworth’s garrison.

 
The MoD rejected her request to transfer to the UK in order to meet her daughter’s education needs. She brought a claim under the Equality Act stating that the MoD had failed to make reasonable adjustments by not changing her place of work.
 

Ms Hainsworth’s claim was rejected by the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal. It was held the duty to make reasonable adjustments does not extend to non-disabled employees who are associated with disabled people.

 
Employers are not required to make reasonable adjustments for employees who are carers of disabled people. On appeal to the Court of Appeal it was held that although direct discrimination and harassment require protection from ‘associative discrimination’, the duty to make reasonable adjustments only extends to disabled employees and not to non-disabled employees associated with a disabled person.
 

Employers should be mindful that employees who have caring duties may request to work flexibly and such requests should be handled sensitively and appropriately. There is not however a test of reasonableness associated with flexible working requests, as there is in respect of adjustments for a disability.
 

Employers should keep lines of communication with such employees open and try and maintain a positive working relationship with them while considering the needs of the business.

 

Got any queries regarding carers, reasonable adjustments and/or flexible working? Give our Employment Team a call on 01745343500 or send an email to info@gamlins.co.uk
 

Case Update: Henman v Ministry of Defence


Criminal Conviction related to Disability: Unfair Dismissal



In Henman v Ministry of Defence, Mr Henman was employed in a civilian capacity by the Ministry of Defence. He lived in shared accommodation provided by the MOD and following being found with video and still images of another employer taken covertly in the shower he pleaded guilty to outraging public decency. He was sentenced to a three year community order. Sackable offence?

 

The Employment Tribunal found that the MOD had unfairly dismissed Mr Henman. It was accepted by the Court that he suffered from Asperger’s syndrome and a number of other mental conditions. He had been dismissed for gross misconduct, which according to the Employment Tribunal was outside of the range of reasonable responses.  It also found that the dismissal was related to his disability and therefore they had breached the Equality Act.

 

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) disagreed. They stated the Employment Tribunal had substituted its own view on reasonableness instead of assessing what a reasonable employer would have decided. In addition they stated they had made an error is assessing proportionality under the Equality Act, focussing entirely on what the Crown Court had said when they had sentenced Mr Henman. The case was sent back to be decided by a different Employment Tribunal.